Find the cause.
When work slips, I ask why it happened, why it was not identified earlier and how we could detect it sooner. Those questions help the team turn a missed commitment into a useful process discussion.
Leadership & approach
I want people to understand what is expected, feel comfortable raising a problem and know that their development matters.
The principles
When work slips, I ask why it happened, why it was not identified earlier and how we could detect it sooner. Those questions help the team turn a missed commitment into a useful process discussion.
People need the current state of the work to make useful decisions. I share progress, blockers and risks, and use the actual build in internal milestone discussions.
I raise risks with practical options. Depending on the situation, that may mean changing priorities, adjusting scope, finding support or discussing a realistic timeline.
Different people understand information in different ways. I observe what helps someone learn, use it deliberately and make space for questions and clarification.
In practice
Expectations & development
At Rockstar, formal performance reviews considered proactiveness, defect count and quality, reliability and initiative. I reviewed the work, gave feedback and provided assessments for the relevant leads to consider.
When recurring reporting mistakes appeared, I added them to onboarding material so the whole team could learn from them. At Ubisoft, feedback on individual reports was shared privately while urgent defects kept moving.
For development requests, I considered the person’s interest, current responsibilities and team impact, then involved the formal approver. If access was not yet appropriate, I explained the reason and the pathway toward eligibility.
Influence & responsibility
At LightFury, I had no direct reports. I built working relationships through regular conversations, clear planning, shared information and practical follow-through with department leads.
I helped allocate approved headcount according to bottlenecks and workload. Leadership retained budget ownership and final hiring decisions.
I assessed team fit in final-stage screening, leaving technical evaluation to the relevant leads. I explained concerns as evidence-based input and supported the person fully once they joined.
The same approach applied to delivery decisions: make the consequences clear, offer workable alternatives and carry the agreed decision through to action.
Continuing to learn
My QUT work has given me more ways to examine questions I encountered in team leadership: how growth affects culture, what supports inclusion and how workload can become a risk to people.
Through organisational research proposals, diversity and inclusion analysis, and an IT workload concept, I have explored psychological safety, ethical leadership, research design and responsible use of information.
Explore the academic work behind these questions